Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$)

Ecuador
-66,000 NFL, current US$
in 2023
Zimbabwe
-43,000 NFL, current US$
in 2024
Ecuador rank
74th
Zimbabwe rank
71st

Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$) over time

  • Ecuador
  • Zimbabwe
025.0M50.0M75.0M100.0M197019972024

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports -43,000 NFL, current US$ against -66,000 NFL, current US$ in Ecuador, a difference of 23,000 NFL, current US$.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 39 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Ecuador ranks 74th and Zimbabwe ranks 71st of 117 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1980s -444,750 NFL, current US$ 6.85 million NFL, current US$ 7.30 million NFL, current US$ Zimbabwe
1990s -1.09 million NFL, current US$ 43.80 million NFL, current US$ 44.89 million NFL, current US$ Zimbabwe
2000s -1.13 million NFL, current US$ 558,667 NFL, current US$ 1.68 million NFL, current US$ Zimbabwe
2010s -933,778 NFL, current US$ -314,222 NFL, current US$ 619,556 NFL, current US$ Zimbabwe
2020s -296,000 NFL, current US$ -428,000 NFL, current US$ 132,000 NFL, current US$ Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, ida, Ecuador or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at -43,000 NFL, current US$ against -66,000 NFL, current US$ in Ecuador as of 2024.
What is the difference in net financial flows, ida between Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
23,000 NFL, current US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
39 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Zimbabwe rank globally for net financial flows, ida?
Ecuador ranks 74th and Zimbabwe ranks 71st of 117 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB), published as Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: Net financial flows, IDA. Statizoid, drawing on International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us/ecuador/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-ida-nfl-current-us/ecuador/zimbabwe/">Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: Net financial flows, IDA</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, IDA (NFL, current US$)
Unit
NFL, current US$
Source
International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
154 places, 7,057 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Net financial flows received by the borrower during the year are disbursements of loans and credits less repayments of principal. IDA is the International Development Association, the concessional loan window of the World Bank Group. Data are in current U.S. dollars.