Burundi vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), annual growth

Burundi
-114.02 % change on previous year
in 2024
Sao Tome and Principe
-105.8 % change on previous year
in 2024
Burundi rank
111th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
109th

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), annual growth over time

  • Burundi
  • Sao Tome and Principe
-50005001.0k197119972024

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports -105.8 % change on previous year against -114.02 % change on previous year in Burundi, a difference of 8.22 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 28 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1978 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Burundi ranks 111th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 109th of 122 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 3 and Sao Tome and Principe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1970s 65.41 % change on previous year 169.88 % change on previous year 104.47 % change on previous year Sao Tome and Principe
1980s 14.17 % change on previous year 48.37 % change on previous year 34.2 % change on previous year Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 20.79 % change on previous year 18.26 % change on previous year 2.53 % change on previous year Burundi
2000s 48.06 % change on previous year 21.85 % change on previous year 26.21 % change on previous year Burundi
2010s 83.82 % change on previous year 138.97 % change on previous year 55.15 % change on previous year Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 170.21 % change on previous year -118.18 % change on previous year 288.39 % change on previous year Burundi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), annual growth, Burundi or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at -105.8 % change on previous year against -114.02 % change on previous year in Burundi as of 2024.
What is the difference in net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), annual growth between Burundi and Sao Tome and Principe?
8.22 % change on previous year, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Sao Tome and Principe?
43 years are reported by both, from 1978 to 2024.
How do Burundi and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), annual growth?
Burundi ranks 111th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 109th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), annual growth. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-annual-growth-rate/burundi/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-annual-growth-rate/burundi/sao-tome-and-principe/">Burundi vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), annual growth</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
134 places, 5,952 data points, 1971–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.