Angola vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per capita

Angola
26.45 NFL, current US$ per person
in 2024
Tanzania, United Republic of
30.42 NFL, current US$ per person
in 2024
Angola rank
47th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
44th

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per capita over time

  • Angola
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
0102030197019972024

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 30.42 NFL, current US$ per person against 26.45 NFL, current US$ per person in Angola, a difference of 3.97 NFL, current US$ per person.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 1.1 times Angola's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1989 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Angola ranks 47th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 44th of 122 countries.

Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1980s 0.3374 NFL, current US$ per person 3.69 NFL, current US$ per person 3.35 NFL, current US$ per person Tanzania, United Republic of
1990s 1.97 NFL, current US$ per person 5.15 NFL, current US$ per person 3.18 NFL, current US$ per person Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s 0.5232 NFL, current US$ per person 10.46 NFL, current US$ per person 9.94 NFL, current US$ per person Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 8.59 NFL, current US$ per person 14.26 NFL, current US$ per person 5.67 NFL, current US$ per person Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 18.81 NFL, current US$ per person 20.9 NFL, current US$ per person 2.1 NFL, current US$ per person Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per capita, Angola or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 30.42 NFL, current US$ per person against 26.45 NFL, current US$ per person in Angola as of 2024.
What is the difference in net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per capita between Angola and Tanzania, United Republic of?
3.97 NFL, current US$ per person, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Tanzania, United Republic of?
36 years are reported by both, from 1989 to 2024.
How do Angola and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per capita?
Angola ranks 47th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 44th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-capita/angola/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-capita/angola/tanzania/">Angola vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per capita
Unit
NFL, current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
134 places, 6,367 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.