Low & middle income vs Mauritius: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per capita

Low & middle income
10.23 NFL, current US$ per person
in 2024
Mauritius
154.02 NFL, current US$ per person
in 2024
Low & middle income rank
7th
Mauritius rank
8th

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per capita over time

  • Low & middle income
  • Mauritius
-1000100200197019972024

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 154.02 NFL, current US$ per person against 10.23 NFL, current US$ per person in Low & middle income, a difference of 143.79 NFL, current US$ per person.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 15.1 times Low & middle income's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Low & middle income ahead.

Low & middle income ranks 7th and Mauritius ranks 8th of 12 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, Low & middle income averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low & middle income Mauritius Difference Ahead
1970s 0.9827 NFL, current US$ per person 5.99 NFL, current US$ per person 5.01 NFL, current US$ per person Mauritius
1980s 2.8 NFL, current US$ per person 16.74 NFL, current US$ per person 13.94 NFL, current US$ per person Mauritius
1990s 2.98 NFL, current US$ per person -4.78 NFL, current US$ per person 7.76 NFL, current US$ per person Low & middle income
2000s 2.3 NFL, current US$ per person 8.64 NFL, current US$ per person 6.33 NFL, current US$ per person Mauritius
2010s 5.24 NFL, current US$ per person 38.51 NFL, current US$ per person 33.27 NFL, current US$ per person Mauritius
2020s 9.91 NFL, current US$ per person 43.73 NFL, current US$ per person 33.82 NFL, current US$ per person Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per capita, Low & middle income or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 154.02 NFL, current US$ per person against 10.23 NFL, current US$ per person in Low & middle income as of 2024.
What is the difference in net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per capita between Low & middle income and Mauritius?
143.79 NFL, current US$ per person, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low & middle income and Mauritius?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Low & middle income and Mauritius rank globally for net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per capita?
Low & middle income ranks 7th and Mauritius ranks 8th of 12 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low & middle income vs Mauritius: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-capita/low-and-middle-income/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-capita/low-and-middle-income/mauritius/">Low & middle income vs Mauritius: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per capita
Unit
NFL, current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
134 places, 6,367 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.