Argentina vs Eswatini: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square

Argentina
1,281 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini
1,579 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Argentina rank
49th
Eswatini rank
46th

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square over time

  • Argentina
  • Eswatini
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k197019962023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 1,579 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,281 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Argentina, a difference of 298 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.2 times Argentina's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 49th and Eswatini ranks 46th of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 2 and Eswatini in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Eswatini Difference Ahead
1970s 32.25 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 225.69 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 193.44 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 101.52 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 343.52 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 241.99 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 396.47 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 133.56 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 262.9 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Argentina
2000s 11.19 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 443.67 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 432.48 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 280.03 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 200.78 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 79.25 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Argentina
2020s 860.89 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 4,306 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 3,445 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square, Argentina or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 1,579 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,281 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Argentina as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square between Argentina and Eswatini?
298 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Eswatini?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Eswatini rank globally for net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square?
Argentina ranks 49th and Eswatini ranks 46th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Eswatini: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/argentina/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/argentina/eswatini/">Argentina vs Eswatini: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,126 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.