Argentina vs Tunisia: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square

Argentina
1,281 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
1,279 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Argentina rank
49th
Tunisia rank
50th

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square over time

  • Argentina
  • Tunisia
02.0k4.0k6.0k197019962023

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 1,281 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,279 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 2 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Tunisia ahead.

Argentina ranks 49th and Tunisia ranks 50th of 121 countries.

Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Tunisia Difference Ahead
1970s 32.25 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 210.95 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 178.7 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1980s 101.52 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 771.84 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 670.32 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1990s 396.47 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,139 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 742.91 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 11.19 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,095 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,084 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 280.03 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 3,892 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 3,612 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 860.89 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,782 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 921.3 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square, Argentina or Tunisia?
Argentina, at 1,281 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,279 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square between Argentina and Tunisia?
2 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Tunisia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Tunisia rank globally for net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square?
Argentina ranks 49th and Tunisia ranks 50th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Tunisia: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/argentina/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/argentina/tunisia/">Argentina vs Tunisia: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,126 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.