Bangladesh vs IDA only: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square

Bangladesh
28,484 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IDA only
856.7 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
9th
IDA only rank
6th

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square over time

  • Bangladesh
  • IDA only
010.0k20.0k30.0k197019962023

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 28,484 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 856.7 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in IDA only, a difference of 27,627 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Bangladesh's figure about 33.2 times IDA only's.

Across all 52 years both countries report, Bangladesh has been ahead every year.

Bangladesh ranks 9th and IDA only ranks 6th of 121 countries.

Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh IDA only Difference Ahead
1970s 815.79 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 48.39 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 767.4 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
1980s 3,057 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 161.56 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 2,895 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
1990s 4,146 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 210.41 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 3,936 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
2000s 4,396 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 268.67 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 4,128 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
2010s 8,513 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 399.09 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 8,114 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
2020s 23,328 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 748.79 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 22,579 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square, Bangladesh or IDA only?
Bangladesh, at 28,484 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 856.7 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in IDA only as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square between Bangladesh and IDA only?
27,627 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and IDA only?
52 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and IDA only rank globally for net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square?
Bangladesh ranks 9th and IDA only ranks 6th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs IDA only: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/ida-only/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/ida-only/">Bangladesh vs IDA only: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,126 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.