Bangladesh vs Rwanda: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square

Bangladesh
28,484 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
33,485 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
9th
Rwanda rank
8th

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Rwanda
010.0k20.0k30.0k197019962023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 33,485 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 28,484 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Bangladesh, a difference of 5,001 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.2 times Bangladesh's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1972 it was Rwanda ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 9th and Rwanda ranks 8th of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 5 and Rwanda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Rwanda Difference Ahead
1970s 815.79 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 354.27 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 461.52 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
1980s 3,057 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,528 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,528 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
1990s 4,146 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 2,115 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 2,031 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
2000s 4,396 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 2,532 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,864 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
2010s 8,513 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 10,221 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,707 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 23,328 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 21,586 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,741 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square, Bangladesh or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 33,485 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 28,484 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Bangladesh as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square between Bangladesh and Rwanda?
5,001 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Rwanda?
52 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Rwanda rank globally for net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square?
Bangladesh ranks 9th and Rwanda ranks 8th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Rwanda: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/rwanda/">Bangladesh vs Rwanda: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,126 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.