Belarus vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square

Belarus
-660.85 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina
-358.67 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
111th
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
109th

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square over time

  • Belarus
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
05.0k10.0k199320082023

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports -358.67 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against -660.85 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 302.18 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

Belarus ranks 111th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 109th of 121 countries.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Bosnia and Herzegovina Difference Ahead
1990s -38.84 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 2,228 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 2,267 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2000s 0.5014 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,296 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,296 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 1,597 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 4,033 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 2,435 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 85.68 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 912.24 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 826.56 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square, Belarus or Bosnia and Herzegovina?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at -358.67 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against -660.85 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square between Belarus and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
302.18 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
25 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Bosnia and Herzegovina rank globally for net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square?
Belarus ranks 111th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 109th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/belarus/bosnia-and-herzegovina/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/belarus/bosnia-and-herzegovina/">Belarus vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,126 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.