Belize vs Guinea: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square

Belize
545.42 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea
631.35 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Belize rank
68th
Guinea rank
66th

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square over time

  • Belize
  • Guinea
01.0k2.0k3.0k197019962023

How they compare

Guinea currently reports 631.35 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 545.42 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Belize, a difference of 85.93 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Belize's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Belize ahead.

Belize ranks 68th and Guinea ranks 66th of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Belize averaged higher in 4 and Guinea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belize Guinea Difference Ahead
1970s 134.31 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 25.52 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 108.78 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Belize
1980s 130.91 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 158.21 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 27.3 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Guinea
1990s 293.54 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 468.44 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 174.9 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Guinea
2000s 522.99 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 25.06 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 497.93 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Belize
2010s 519.8 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 151.75 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 368.06 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Belize
2020s 1,723 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 629.07 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,094 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Belize

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square, Belize or Guinea?
Guinea, at 631.35 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 545.42 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Belize as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square between Belize and Guinea?
85.93 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Guinea?
50 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2023.
How do Belize and Guinea rank globally for net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square?
Belize ranks 68th and Guinea ranks 66th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belize vs Guinea: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/belize/guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/belize/guinea/">Belize vs Guinea: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,126 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.