Belize vs Guyana: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square

Belize
545.42 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guyana
513.72 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Belize rank
68th
Guyana rank
71st

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square over time

  • Belize
  • Guyana
01.0k2.0k3.0k197019962023

How they compare

Belize currently reports 545.42 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 513.72 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Guyana, a difference of 31.7 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Belize's figure about 1.1 times Guyana's.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Guyana ahead.

Belize ranks 68th and Guyana ranks 71st of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Belize averaged higher in 5 and Guyana in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belize Guyana Difference Ahead
1970s 134.31 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 62.3 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 72 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Belize
1980s 130.91 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 136.76 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 5.85 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Guyana
1990s 293.54 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 150.59 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 142.95 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Belize
2000s 522.99 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 247.7 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 275.29 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Belize
2010s 519.8 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 199.01 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 320.8 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Belize
2020s 1,723 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 455.89 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,267 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Belize

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square, Belize or Guyana?
Belize, at 545.42 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 513.72 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Guyana as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square between Belize and Guyana?
31.7 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Belize ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Guyana?
50 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2023.
How do Belize and Guyana rank globally for net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square?
Belize ranks 68th and Guyana ranks 71st of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belize vs Guyana: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/belize/guyana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/belize/guyana/">Belize vs Guyana: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,126 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.