Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Kazakhstan: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square

Bosnia and Herzegovina
-358.67 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Kazakhstan
-184.18 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
109th
Kazakhstan rank
107th

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Kazakhstan
-2.5k02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k199320082023

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports -184.18 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against -358.67 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 174.49 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 109th and Kazakhstan ranks 107th of 121 countries.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1990s 2,228 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 88.33 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 2,139 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2000s 1,296 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre -6.62 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,303 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 4,033 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 176.15 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 3,857 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 912.24 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 14.4 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 897.84 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Kazakhstan?
Kazakhstan, at -184.18 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against -358.67 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kazakhstan?
174.49 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kazakhstan?
25 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kazakhstan rank globally for net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 109th and Kazakhstan ranks 107th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Kazakhstan: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/kazakhstan/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Kazakhstan: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,126 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.