Botswana vs Myanmar: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square

Botswana
-179.34 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Myanmar
-158.38 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
106th
Myanmar rank
105th

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square over time

  • Botswana
  • Myanmar
05001.0k1.5k197019962023

How they compare

Myanmar currently reports -158.38 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against -179.34 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 20.96 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 106th and Myanmar ranks 105th of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Myanmar in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Myanmar Difference Ahead
1970s 12.45 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 34.49 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 22.04 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Myanmar
1980s 42.13 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 121.92 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 79.79 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Myanmar
1990s -7.35 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre -1.84 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 5.51 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Myanmar
2000s 141.33 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1.12 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 140.21 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Botswana
2010s 8.87 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 138.68 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 129.82 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Myanmar
2020s 63.27 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 151.05 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 87.78 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Myanmar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square, Botswana or Myanmar?
Myanmar, at -158.38 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against -179.34 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square between Botswana and Myanmar?
20.96 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Myanmar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Myanmar?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Myanmar rank globally for net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square?
Botswana ranks 106th and Myanmar ranks 105th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Myanmar: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/myanmar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/myanmar/">Botswana vs Myanmar: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,126 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.