Brazil vs Turkey: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) … square

Brazil
132.59 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Turkey
147.48 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
84th
Turkey rank
83rd

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) … square over time

  • Brazil
  • Turkey
-2.0k02.0k4.0k197019962023

How they compare

Turkey currently reports 147.48 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 132.59 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Brazil, a difference of 14.89 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Turkey's figure about 1.1 times Brazil's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Turkey ahead.

Brazil ranks 84th and Turkey ranks 83rd of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Turkey in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Turkey Difference Ahead
1970s 31.72 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 183.43 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 151.71 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Turkey
1980s 69.64 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 675.99 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 606.35 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Turkey
1990s 79.21 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre -473.04 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 552.24 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Brazil
2000s 54.58 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,250 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,195 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Turkey
2010s 101.3 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,878 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,777 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Turkey
2020s 94.51 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre -442.07 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 536.59 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square, Brazil or Turkey?
Turkey, at 147.48 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 132.59 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square between Brazil and Turkey?
14.89 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Turkey ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Turkey?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Turkey rank globally for net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square?
Brazil ranks 84th and Turkey ranks 83rd of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Turkey: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/turkiye/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/turkiye/">Brazil vs Turkey: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,126 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.