Burundi vs Cameroon: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square

Burundi
794.86 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cameroon
959.92 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Burundi rank
61st
Cameroon rank
58th

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square over time

  • Burundi
  • Cameroon
01.0k2.0k3.0k197019962023

How they compare

Cameroon currently reports 959.92 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 794.86 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Burundi, a difference of 165.06 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Cameroon's figure about 1.2 times Burundi's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Burundi ahead.

Burundi ranks 61st and Cameroon ranks 58th of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 4 and Cameroon in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Cameroon Difference Ahead
1970s 136.56 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 74.25 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 62.31 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Burundi
1980s 1,895 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 131.15 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,764 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Burundi
1990s 1,372 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 68 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,304 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Burundi
2000s 794.16 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 66.4 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 727.75 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Burundi
2010s 499.98 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 672.15 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 172.17 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Cameroon
2020s 695.12 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,036 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 341.02 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Cameroon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square, Burundi or Cameroon?
Cameroon, at 959.92 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 794.86 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Burundi as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square between Burundi and Cameroon?
165.06 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Cameroon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Cameroon?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Burundi and Cameroon rank globally for net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square?
Burundi ranks 61st and Cameroon ranks 58th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Cameroon: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/burundi/cameroon/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/burundi/cameroon/">Burundi vs Cameroon: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,126 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.