Cape Verde vs Philippines: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square

Cape Verde
9,325 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Philippines
12,371 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cape Verde rank
18th
Philippines rank
15th

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Philippines
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k197019962023

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 12,371 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 9,325 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Cape Verde, a difference of 3,046 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Philippines's figure about 1.3 times Cape Verde's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Philippines ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 18th and Philippines ranks 15th of 121 countries.

Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Philippines Difference Ahead
1980s 1,515 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,052 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 463.59 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
1990s 3,462 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 557.41 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 2,905 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
2000s 6,424 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 109.37 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 6,315 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
2010s 11,003 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,653 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 9,349 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
2020s 16,056 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 13,373 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 2,683 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square, Cape Verde or Philippines?
Philippines, at 12,371 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 9,325 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Cape Verde as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square between Cape Verde and Philippines?
3,046 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Philippines?
43 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2023.
How do Cape Verde and Philippines rank globally for net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square?
Cape Verde ranks 18th and Philippines ranks 15th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Philippines: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/philippines/">Cape Verde vs Philippines: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,126 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.