Cameroon vs Zimbabwe: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square

Cameroon
959.92 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
969.59 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cameroon rank
58th
Zimbabwe rank
57th

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square over time

  • Cameroon
  • Zimbabwe
05001.0k1.5k2.0k197019962023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 969.59 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 959.92 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Cameroon, a difference of 9.67 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Cameroon ahead.

Cameroon ranks 58th and Zimbabwe ranks 57th of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Cameroon averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cameroon Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 74.25 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre -9.89 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 84.14 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Cameroon
1980s 131.15 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 119.19 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 11.96 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Cameroon
1990s 68 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 235.7 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 167.7 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 66.4 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre -5.44 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 71.84 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Cameroon
2010s 672.15 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre -0.2173 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 672.37 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Cameroon
2020s 1,036 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 237.26 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 798.88 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Cameroon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square, Cameroon or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 969.59 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 959.92 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Cameroon as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square between Cameroon and Zimbabwe?
9.67 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Zimbabwe?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Cameroon and Zimbabwe rank globally for net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square?
Cameroon ranks 58th and Zimbabwe ranks 57th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cameroon vs Zimbabwe: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cameroon/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cameroon/zimbabwe/">Cameroon vs Zimbabwe: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,126 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.