Dominica vs Middle income: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square

Dominica
49,397 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Middle income
1,134 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Dominica rank
6th
Middle income rank
4th

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square over time

  • Dominica
  • Middle income
020.0k40.0k60.0k197019962023

How they compare

Dominica currently reports 49,397 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,134 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Middle income, a difference of 48,263 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Dominica's figure about 43.6 times Middle income's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Dominica ahead.

Dominica ranks 6th and Middle income ranks 4th of 121 countries.

Dominica has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominica Middle income Difference Ahead
1980s 5,727 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 165.5 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 5,562 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Dominica
1990s 2,660 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 193.51 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 2,467 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Dominica
2000s 5,029 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 160.88 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 4,868 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Dominica
2010s 1,301 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 448.19 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 852.88 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Dominica
2020s 49,769 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 958.15 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 48,811 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Dominica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square, Dominica or Middle income?
Dominica, at 49,397 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,134 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Middle income as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square between Dominica and Middle income?
48,263 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Dominica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Middle income?
43 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2023.
How do Dominica and Middle income rank globally for net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square?
Dominica ranks 6th and Middle income ranks 4th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominica vs Middle income: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/dominica/middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/dominica/middle-income/">Dominica vs Middle income: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,126 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.