El Salvador vs Rwanda: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square

El Salvador
51,769 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
33,485 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador rank
5th
Rwanda rank
8th

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square over time

  • El Salvador
  • Rwanda
020.0k40.0k60.0k197019962023

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 51,769 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 33,485 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 18,284 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.5 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 5th and Rwanda ranks 8th of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 5 and Rwanda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Rwanda Difference Ahead
1970s 1,213 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 284.3 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 928.44 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador
1980s 2,313 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,528 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 784.15 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador
1990s 4,744 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 2,115 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 2,629 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 5,998 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 2,532 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 3,466 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 4,339 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 10,221 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 5,882 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 27,279 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 21,586 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 5,693 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square, El Salvador or Rwanda?
El Salvador, at 51,769 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 33,485 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square between El Salvador and Rwanda?
18,284 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Rwanda?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and Rwanda rank globally for net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square?
El Salvador ranks 5th and Rwanda ranks 8th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Rwanda: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/rwanda/">El Salvador vs Rwanda: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,126 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.