Eswatini vs Indonesia: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square

Eswatini
1,579 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Indonesia
1,596 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
46th
Indonesia rank
45th

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square over time

  • Eswatini
  • Indonesia
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k197019962023

How they compare

Indonesia currently reports 1,596 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,579 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 17 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 46th and Indonesia ranks 45th of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 3 and Indonesia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Indonesia Difference Ahead
1970s 225.69 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 78.89 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 146.79 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 343.52 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 492.5 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 148.98 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Indonesia
1990s 133.56 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 332.22 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 198.66 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Indonesia
2000s 443.67 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 24.14 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 419.53 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 200.78 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 546.61 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 345.82 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Indonesia
2020s 4,306 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,120 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 3,186 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square, Eswatini or Indonesia?
Indonesia, at 1,596 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,579 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square between Eswatini and Indonesia?
17 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Indonesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Indonesia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Indonesia rank globally for net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square?
Eswatini ranks 46th and Indonesia ranks 45th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Indonesia: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/indonesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/indonesia/">Eswatini vs Indonesia: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,126 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.