Eswatini vs Liberia: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square

Eswatini
1,579 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Liberia
1,645 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
46th
Liberia rank
44th

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square over time

  • Eswatini
  • Liberia
-5.0k05.0k10.0k197019962023

How they compare

Liberia currently reports 1,645 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,579 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 66 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Liberia ahead.

Eswatini ranks 46th and Liberia ranks 44th of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 4 and Liberia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Liberia Difference Ahead
1970s 225.69 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 97.54 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 128.15 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 343.52 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 251.83 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 91.69 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s -87.67 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre -16.88 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 70.8 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Liberia
2000s 443.67 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre -314.06 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 757.73 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 200.78 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 704.98 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 504.2 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Liberia
2020s 4,306 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,233 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 3,073 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square, Eswatini or Liberia?
Liberia, at 1,645 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,579 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square between Eswatini and Liberia?
66 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Liberia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Liberia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Liberia rank globally for net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square?
Eswatini ranks 46th and Liberia ranks 44th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Liberia: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/liberia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/liberia/">Eswatini vs Liberia: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,126 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.