Grenada vs Mauritius: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square

Grenada
79,276 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
106,451 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Grenada rank
4th
Mauritius rank
3rd

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square over time

  • Grenada
  • Mauritius
-50.0k050.0k100.0k197019962023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 106,451 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 79,276 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Grenada, a difference of 27,175 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.3 times Grenada's.

The two have swapped places 16 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Mauritius ahead.

Grenada ranks 4th and Mauritius ranks 3rd of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Grenada averaged higher in 5 and Mauritius in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Grenada Mauritius Difference Ahead
1970s 2,910 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 4,394 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,483 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 8,904 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 8,325 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 578.46 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Grenada
1990s 5,232 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre -2,587 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 7,819 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Grenada
2000s 36,939 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 5,318 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 31,621 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Grenada
2010s 33,200 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 24,072 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 9,128 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Grenada
2020s 84,840 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 9,886 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 74,954 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Grenada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square, Grenada or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 106,451 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 79,276 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Grenada as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square between Grenada and Mauritius?
27,175 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Mauritius?
50 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2023.
How do Grenada and Mauritius rank globally for net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square?
Grenada ranks 4th and Mauritius ranks 3rd of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Grenada vs Mauritius: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/grenada/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/grenada/mauritius/">Grenada vs Mauritius: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,126 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.