Guatemala vs Mexico: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square

Guatemala
-1,685 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico
-941.83 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
116th
Mexico rank
113th

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square over time

  • Guatemala
  • Mexico
-5.0k-2.5k02.5k5.0k197019962023

How they compare

Mexico currently reports -941.83 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against -1,685 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 743.17 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 116th and Mexico ranks 113th of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 5 and Mexico in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Mexico Difference Ahead
1970s 316.45 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 107.34 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 209.11 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
1980s 471.54 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 297.36 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 174.18 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
1990s 355.49 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 261.26 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 94.23 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 1,919 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 20.02 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,899 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 1,026 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 753.17 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 272.55 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s -263.31 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre -127 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 136.31 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square, Guatemala or Mexico?
Mexico, at -941.83 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against -1,685 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square between Guatemala and Mexico?
743.17 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Mexico?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Mexico rank globally for net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square?
Guatemala ranks 116th and Mexico ranks 113th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Mexico: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/mexico/">Guatemala vs Mexico: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,126 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.