Guatemala vs Samoa: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square

Guatemala
-1,685 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Samoa
-3,532 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
116th
Samoa rank
118th

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square over time

  • Guatemala
  • Samoa
-5.0k05.0k10.0k15.0k197019962023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports -1,685 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against -3,532 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Samoa, a difference of 1,847 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 17 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Samoa ahead.

Guatemala ranks 116th and Samoa ranks 118th of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 2 and Samoa in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Samoa Difference Ahead
1970s 363.29 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,003 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 639.71 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Samoa
1980s 471.54 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,323 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 851.89 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Samoa
1990s 355.49 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 2,311 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,955 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Samoa
2000s 1,919 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 738.76 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,180 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 1,026 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,796 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 770.15 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Samoa
2020s -263.31 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre -3,241 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 2,977 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square, Guatemala or Samoa?
Guatemala, at -1,685 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against -3,532 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Samoa as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square between Guatemala and Samoa?
1,847 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Samoa?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Samoa rank globally for net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square?
Guatemala ranks 116th and Samoa ranks 118th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Samoa: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/samoa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/samoa/">Guatemala vs Samoa: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,126 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.