IDA only vs Rwanda: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square

IDA only
856.7 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
33,485 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IDA only rank
6th
Rwanda rank
8th

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square over time

  • IDA only
  • Rwanda
010.0k20.0k30.0k197019962023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 33,485 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 856.7 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in IDA only, a difference of 32,628 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 39.1 times IDA only's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was IDA only ahead.

IDA only ranks 6th and Rwanda ranks 8th of 12 groups.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade IDA only Rwanda Difference Ahead
1970s 40.59 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 284.3 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 243.72 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 161.56 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,528 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,367 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 210.41 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 2,115 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,905 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 268.67 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 2,532 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 2,264 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 399.09 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 10,221 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 9,822 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 748.79 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 21,586 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 20,837 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square, IDA only or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 33,485 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 856.7 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in IDA only as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square between IDA only and Rwanda?
32,628 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IDA only and Rwanda?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do IDA only and Rwanda rank globally for net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square?
IDA only ranks 6th and Rwanda ranks 8th of 12 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IDA only vs Rwanda: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ida-only/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ida-only/rwanda/">IDA only vs Rwanda: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,126 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.