Jamaica vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square

Jamaica
-15,618 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis
-8,665 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2010
Jamaica rank
121st
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
120th

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square over time

  • Jamaica
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
-20.0k020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k197019962023

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports -8,665 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against -15,618 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Jamaica, a difference of 6,953 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1984 it was Jamaica ahead.

Jamaica ranks 121st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 120th of 121 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 1 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1980s 4,609 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 5,819 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,210 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1990s -1,255 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 14,003 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 15,258 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 2,902 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 19,149 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 16,247 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 77,073 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre -8,665 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 85,739 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square, Jamaica or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at -8,665 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against -15,618 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Jamaica as of 2010.
What is the difference in net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square between Jamaica and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
6,953 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
27 years are reported by both, from 1984 to 2010.
How do Jamaica and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square?
Jamaica ranks 121st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 120th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Jamaica vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,126 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.