Low income vs Sri Lanka: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square

Low income
306.89 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
18,736 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Low income rank
12th
Sri Lanka rank
12th

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square over time

  • Low income
  • Sri Lanka
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k197019962023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 18,736 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 306.89 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Low income, a difference of 18,429 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 61.1 times Low income's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.

Low income ranks 12th and Sri Lanka ranks 12th of 12 groups.

Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low income Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1970s 23.38 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 247.77 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 224.4 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1980s 100.88 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,586 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,485 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1990s 117.05 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 3,075 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 2,958 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2000s 182.24 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 3,161 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 2,979 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2010s 228.12 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 4,939 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 4,711 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2020s 262.11 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 13,611 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 13,349 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square, Low income or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 18,736 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 306.89 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Low income as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square between Low income and Sri Lanka?
18,429 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low income and Sri Lanka?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Low income and Sri Lanka rank globally for net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square?
Low income ranks 12th and Sri Lanka ranks 12th of 12 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low income vs Sri Lanka: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/low-income/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/low-income/sri-lanka/">Low income vs Sri Lanka: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,126 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.