Low income vs Saint Lucia: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square

Low income
306.89 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Saint Lucia
18,267 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Low income rank
12th
Saint Lucia rank
13th

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square over time

  • Low income
  • Saint Lucia
050.0k100.0k197019962023

How they compare

Saint Lucia currently reports 18,267 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 306.89 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Low income, a difference of 17,960 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Saint Lucia's figure about 59.5 times Low income's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Saint Lucia ahead.

Low income ranks 12th and Saint Lucia ranks 13th of 12 groups.

Saint Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low income Saint Lucia Difference Ahead
1980s 104.04 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 4,590 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 4,486 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Saint Lucia
1990s 117.05 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 9,954 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 9,837 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Saint Lucia
2000s 182.24 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 12,941 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 12,759 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Saint Lucia
2010s 228.12 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,440 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,212 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Saint Lucia
2020s 262.11 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 55,951 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 55,689 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Saint Lucia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square, Low income or Saint Lucia?
Saint Lucia, at 18,267 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 306.89 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Low income as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square between Low income and Saint Lucia?
17,960 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Saint Lucia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low income and Saint Lucia?
43 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2023.
How do Low income and Saint Lucia rank globally for net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square?
Low income ranks 12th and Saint Lucia ranks 13th of 12 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low income vs Saint Lucia: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/low-income/st-lucia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/low-income/st-lucia/">Low income vs Saint Lucia: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,126 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.