Malawi vs Nicaragua: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square

Malawi
3,663 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nicaragua
3,113 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi rank
32nd
Nicaragua rank
35th

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square over time

  • Malawi
  • Nicaragua
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k197019962023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 3,663 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 3,113 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Nicaragua, a difference of 550 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malawi's figure about 1.2 times Nicaragua's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Nicaragua ahead.

Malawi ranks 32nd and Nicaragua ranks 35th of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 2 and Nicaragua in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Nicaragua Difference Ahead
1970s 168.49 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 263.23 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 94.74 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
1980s 710.67 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 299 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 411.67 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
1990s 1,208 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,185 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 22.55 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
2000s 689.26 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,512 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 822.78 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
2010s 1,240 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 2,377 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,138 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
2020s 2,464 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 3,596 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,133 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square, Malawi or Nicaragua?
Malawi, at 3,663 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 3,113 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Nicaragua as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square between Malawi and Nicaragua?
550 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Nicaragua?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Malawi and Nicaragua rank globally for net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square?
Malawi ranks 32nd and Nicaragua ranks 35th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Nicaragua: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malawi/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malawi/nicaragua/">Malawi vs Nicaragua: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,126 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.