Mexico vs Thailand: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square

Mexico
-941.83 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Thailand
-810.29 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico rank
113th
Thailand rank
112th

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square over time

  • Mexico
  • Thailand
-4.0k-2.0k02.0k4.0k197019962023

How they compare

Thailand currently reports -810.29 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against -941.83 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Mexico, a difference of 131.54 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Mexico ahead.

Mexico ranks 113th and Thailand ranks 112th of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 2 and Thailand in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Thailand Difference Ahead
1970s 107.34 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 125.13 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 17.79 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Thailand
1980s 297.36 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 326.32 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 28.96 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Thailand
1990s 261.26 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 276.33 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 15.06 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Thailand
2000s 20.02 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre -1,010 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,030 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Mexico
2010s 753.17 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 192.31 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 560.87 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Mexico
2020s -127 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 347.9 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 474.9 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Thailand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square, Mexico or Thailand?
Thailand, at -810.29 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against -941.83 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Mexico as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square between Mexico and Thailand?
131.54 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Thailand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Thailand?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Mexico and Thailand rank globally for net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square?
Mexico ranks 113th and Thailand ranks 112th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Thailand: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mexico/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mexico/thailand/">Mexico vs Thailand: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,126 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.