Nepal vs Nicaragua: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square

Nepal
3,653 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nicaragua
3,113 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nepal rank
33rd
Nicaragua rank
35th

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square over time

  • Nepal
  • Nicaragua
02.0k4.0k6.0k197019962023

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 3,653 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 3,113 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Nicaragua, a difference of 540 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Nepal's figure about 1.2 times Nicaragua's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Nicaragua ahead.

Nepal ranks 33rd and Nicaragua ranks 35th of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Nepal averaged higher in 2 and Nicaragua in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nepal Nicaragua Difference Ahead
1970s 64.61 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 263.23 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 198.62 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
1980s 620.51 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 299 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 321.51 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Nepal
1990s 837.05 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,185 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 348.06 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
2000s 334.73 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,512 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,177 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
2010s 1,593 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 2,377 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 784.04 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
2020s 4,694 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 3,596 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,097 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square, Nepal or Nicaragua?
Nepal, at 3,653 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 3,113 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Nicaragua as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square between Nepal and Nicaragua?
540 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Nicaragua?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Nepal and Nicaragua rank globally for net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square?
Nepal ranks 33rd and Nicaragua ranks 35th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nepal vs Nicaragua: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/nepal/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/nepal/nicaragua/">Nepal vs Nicaragua: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,126 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.