Nicaragua vs Pakistan: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square

Nicaragua
3,113 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
2,921 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nicaragua rank
35th
Pakistan rank
37th

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square over time

  • Nicaragua
  • Pakistan
02.0k4.0k197019962023

How they compare

Nicaragua currently reports 3,113 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 2,921 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Pakistan, a difference of 192 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.1 times Pakistan's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Nicaragua ahead.

Nicaragua ranks 35th and Pakistan ranks 37th of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Nicaragua averaged higher in 5 and Pakistan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nicaragua Pakistan Difference Ahead
1970s 263.23 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 122.1 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 141.13 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
1980s 299 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 481.9 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 182.9 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
1990s 1,185 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 965.12 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 219.98 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
2000s 1,512 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 982.01 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 530.03 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
2010s 2,377 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,176 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,201 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
2020s 3,596 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 2,962 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 633.95 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square, Nicaragua or Pakistan?
Nicaragua, at 3,113 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 2,921 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Pakistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square between Nicaragua and Pakistan?
192 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Nicaragua ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Pakistan?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Nicaragua and Pakistan rank globally for net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square?
Nicaragua ranks 35th and Pakistan ranks 37th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nicaragua vs Pakistan: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/nicaragua/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/nicaragua/pakistan/">Nicaragua vs Pakistan: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,126 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.