Pakistan vs Togo: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square

Pakistan
2,921 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Togo
3,370 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan rank
37th
Togo rank
34th

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square over time

  • Pakistan
  • Togo
-2.0k02.0k4.0k197019962023

How they compare

Togo currently reports 3,370 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 2,921 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Pakistan, a difference of 449 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Togo's figure about 1.2 times Pakistan's.

The two have swapped places 17 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Pakistan ahead.

Pakistan ranks 37th and Togo ranks 34th of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 4 and Togo in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan Togo Difference Ahead
1970s 122.1 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 143.08 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 20.98 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Togo
1980s 481.9 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 602.47 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 120.57 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Togo
1990s 965.12 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 575.74 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 389.38 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2000s 982.01 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre -152.79 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,135 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2010s 1,176 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 1,007 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 168.83 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2020s 2,962 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 2,350 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre 612.34 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square, Pakistan or Togo?
Togo, at 3,370 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 2,921 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Pakistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square between Pakistan and Togo?
449 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Togo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Togo?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Pakistan and Togo rank globally for net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square?
Pakistan ranks 37th and Togo ranks 34th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs Togo: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/pakistan/togo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-square-kilometre/pakistan/togo/">Pakistan vs Togo: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,126 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.