Rwanda vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square over time
- Rwanda
- Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 33,485 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 780.45 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), a difference of 32,705 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 42.9 times Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ahead.
Rwanda ranks 8th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 8th of 121 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 284.3 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 26.16 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 258.14 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | Rwanda |
| 1980s | 1,528 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 108.83 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 1,420 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | Rwanda |
| 1990s | 2,115 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 118.03 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 1,997 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 2,532 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 144.86 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 2,388 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 10,221 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 375.05 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 9,846 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 21,586 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 628.78 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | 20,957 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square, Rwanda or Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- Rwanda, at 33,485 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre against 780.45 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square between Rwanda and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- 32,705 NFL, current US$ per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- 54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
- How do Rwanda and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank globally for net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per square?
- Rwanda ranks 8th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 8th of 121 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.