Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Lebanon: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP

Bosnia and Herzegovina
0.0056 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Lebanon
0.0069 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
63rd
Lebanon rank
60th

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Lebanon
-0.02-0.0100.010.020.03198820062024

How they compare

Lebanon currently reports 0.0069 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0056 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.0013 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Lebanon's figure about 1.2 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 63rd and Lebanon ranks 60th of 122 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 3 and Lebanon in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Lebanon Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0243 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0099 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0144 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Bosnia and Herzegovina
2000s 0.0043 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0023 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.002 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 0.0115 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0001 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0114 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 0.0028 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0049 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0021 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Lebanon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per unit of gdp, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Lebanon?
Lebanon, at 0.0069 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0056 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2024.
What is the difference in net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per unit of gdp between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Lebanon?
0.0013 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Lebanon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Lebanon?
26 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2024.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Lebanon rank globally for net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per unit of gdp?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 63rd and Lebanon ranks 60th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Lebanon: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/bosnia-and-herzegovina/lebanon/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/bosnia-and-herzegovina/lebanon/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Lebanon: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
134 places, 6,221 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.