Low & middle income vs Rwanda: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP

Low & middle income
0.0017 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Rwanda
0.0472 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Low & middle income rank
7th
Rwanda rank
4th

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Low & middle income
  • Rwanda
00.020.040.06197019972024

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0.0472 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0017 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP in Low & middle income, a difference of 0.0455 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 27.1 times Low & middle income's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Low & middle income ahead.

Low & middle income ranks 7th and Rwanda ranks 4th of 12 groups.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low & middle income Rwanda Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0026 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0105 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0079 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
1980s 0.0042 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0204 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0162 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
1990s 0.0031 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0298 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0267 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
2000s 0.0012 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0222 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.021 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
2010s 0.0012 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0286 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0273 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
2020s 0.0018 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0434 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0415 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per unit of gdp, Low & middle income or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 0.0472 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0017 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP in Low & middle income as of 2024.
What is the difference in net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per unit of gdp between Low & middle income and Rwanda?
0.0455 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low & middle income and Rwanda?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Low & middle income and Rwanda rank globally for net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per unit of gdp?
Low & middle income ranks 7th and Rwanda ranks 4th of 12 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low & middle income vs Rwanda: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/low-and-middle-income/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/low-and-middle-income/rwanda/">Low & middle income vs Rwanda: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
134 places, 6,221 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.