Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) vs Suriname: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP

Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
0.0101 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Suriname
0.0651 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank
3rd
Suriname rank
2nd

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
  • Suriname
00.020.040.06197019972024

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 0.0651 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0101 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), a difference of 0.055 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Suriname's figure about 6.5 times Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Suriname ahead.

Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 3rd and Suriname ranks 2nd of 12 groups.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) Suriname Difference Ahead
2010s 0.006 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0108 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0047 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Suriname
2020s 0.0071 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0302 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0231 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per unit of gdp, Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) or Suriname?
Suriname, at 0.0651 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0101 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per unit of gdp between Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) and Suriname?
0.055 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) and Suriname?
9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
How do Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) and Suriname rank globally for net financial flows, multilateral (nfl, current us$), per unit of gdp?
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 3rd and Suriname ranks 2nd of 12 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) vs Suriname: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/suriname/">Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) vs Suriname: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
134 places, 6,221 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.