Belize vs Equatorial Guinea: Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$)

Belize
8.11 million NFL, current US$
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea
10.55 million NFL, current US$
in 2025
Belize rank
81st
Equatorial Guinea rank
79th

Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$) over time

  • Belize
  • Equatorial Guinea
020.0M40.0M60.0M197419992025

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 10.55 million NFL, current US$ against 8.11 million NFL, current US$ in Belize, a difference of 2.44 million NFL, current US$.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.3 times Belize's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Belize ahead.

Belize ranks 81st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 79th of 124 countries.

Belize has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belize Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
2010s 19.31 million NFL, current US$ -6.36 million NFL, current US$ 25.67 million NFL, current US$ Belize
2020s 30.23 million NFL, current US$ 1.30 million NFL, current US$ 28.93 million NFL, current US$ Belize

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, multilateral, Belize or Equatorial Guinea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 10.55 million NFL, current US$ against 8.11 million NFL, current US$ in Belize as of 2025.
What is the difference in net financial flows, multilateral between Belize and Equatorial Guinea?
2.44 million NFL, current US$, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Equatorial Guinea?
7 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2025.
How do Belize and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for net financial flows, multilateral?
Belize ranks 81st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 79th of 124 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB), published as Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belize vs Equatorial Guinea: Net financial flows, multilateral. Statizoid, drawing on International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us/belize/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-multilateral-nfl-current-us/belize/equatorial-guinea/">Belize vs Equatorial Guinea: Net financial flows, multilateral</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$)
Unit
NFL, current US$
Source
International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
137 places, 6,577 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

Public and publicly guaranteed multilateral loans include loans and credits from the World Bank, regional development banks, and other multilateral and intergovernmental agencies. Excluded are loans from funds administered by an international organization on behalf of a single donor government; these are classified as loans from governments. Net flows (or net lending or net disbursements) received by the borrower during the year are disbursements minus principal repayments. Data are in current U.S. dollars.