Bangladesh vs Kosovo: Net financial flows, others (NFL, current US$), gaps filled
Net financial flows, others (NFL, current US$), gaps filled over time
- Bangladesh
- Kosovo
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 75.43 million NFL, current US$ against 70.25 million NFL, current US$ in Kosovo, a difference of 5.18 million NFL, current US$.
That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.1 times Kosovo's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Bangladesh has been ahead every year.
Bangladesh ranks 23rd and Kosovo ranks 24th of 121 countries.
Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Kosovo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 79.72 million NFL, current US$ | 6.44 million NFL, current US$ | 73.28 million NFL, current US$ | Bangladesh |
| 2020s | 128.75 million NFL, current US$ | 35.26 million NFL, current US$ | 93.50 million NFL, current US$ | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net financial flows, others (nfl, current us$), gaps filled, Bangladesh or Kosovo?
- Bangladesh, at 75.43 million NFL, current US$ against 70.25 million NFL, current US$ in Kosovo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in net financial flows, others (nfl, current us$), gaps filled between Bangladesh and Kosovo?
- 5.18 million NFL, current US$, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Kosovo?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2024.
- How do Bangladesh and Kosovo rank globally for net financial flows, others (nfl, current us$), gaps filled?
- Bangladesh ranks 23rd and Kosovo ranks 24th of 121 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, others (NFL, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net financial flows, others (NFL, current US$) with 86 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.