How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Eswatini?

30 years are reported by both, from 1983 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, others (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Argentina vs Eswatini: Net financial flows, others (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP

Argentina

-0.0007 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Eswatini

-0.0008 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Argentina rank

98th

Eswatini rank

99th

Net financial flows, others (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP over time

Argentina
Eswatini

How they compare

Argentina currently reports -0.0007 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP against -0.0008 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0001 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1983 it was Eswatini ahead.

Argentina ranks 98th and Eswatini ranks 99th of 121 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 2 and Eswatini in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Argentina	Eswatini	Difference	Ahead
1980s	0.0001 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP	-0.0012 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0013 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP	Argentina
1990s	-0.0001 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0005 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0006 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP	Eswatini
2000s	0.0007 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0017 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.001 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP	Eswatini
2010s	0.0005 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0001 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0004 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP	Argentina
2020s	0.0007 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.001 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0003 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP	Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, others (nfl, current us$), per unit of gdp, Argentina or Eswatini?: Argentina, at -0.0007 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP against -0.0008 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP in Eswatini as of 2024.
What is the difference in net financial flows, others (nfl, current us$), per unit of gdp between Argentina and Eswatini?: 0.0001 NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Eswatini?: 30 years are reported by both, from 1983 to 2024.
How do Argentina and Eswatini rank globally for net financial flows, others (nfl, current us$), per unit of gdp?: Argentina ranks 98th and Eswatini ranks 99th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Net financial flows, others (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Eswatini: Net financial flows, others (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-others-nfl-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/argentina/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-others-nfl-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/argentina/eswatini/">Argentina vs Eswatini: Net financial flows, others (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Net financial flows, others (NFL, current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: NFL, current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 133 places, 5,585 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 26 August 2026

Net financial flows, others (NFL, current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.