Afghanistan vs Ecuador: Net financial flows, RDB concessional

Afghanistan
-17.79 million NFL, current US$
in 2024
Ecuador
-13.00 million NFL, current US$
in 2024
Afghanistan rank
84th
Ecuador rank
81st

Net financial flows, RDB concessional over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Ecuador
-25.0M025.0M50.0M75.0M100.0M197019972024

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports -13.00 million NFL, current US$ against -17.79 million NFL, current US$ in Afghanistan, a difference of 4.79 million NFL, current US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Afghanistan ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 84th and Ecuador ranks 81st of 94 countries.

Afghanistan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Ecuador Difference Ahead
2000s 71.31 million NFL, current US$ -27.89 million NFL, current US$ 99.20 million NFL, current US$ Afghanistan
2010s 13.57 million NFL, current US$ -25.52 million NFL, current US$ 39.09 million NFL, current US$ Afghanistan
2020s -7.48 million NFL, current US$ -17.47 million NFL, current US$ 9.99 million NFL, current US$ Afghanistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, rdb concessional, Afghanistan or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at -13.00 million NFL, current US$ against -17.79 million NFL, current US$ in Afghanistan as of 2024.
What is the difference in net financial flows, rdb concessional between Afghanistan and Ecuador?
4.79 million NFL, current US$, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Ecuador?
19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
How do Afghanistan and Ecuador rank globally for net financial flows, rdb concessional?
Afghanistan ranks 84th and Ecuador ranks 81st of 94 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB), note: https://www.worldbank.org/en/programs/debt-statistics, published as Net financial flows, RDB concessional (NFL, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Ecuador: Net financial flows, RDB concessional. Statizoid, drawing on International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB), note: https://www.worldbank.org/en/programs/debt-statistics. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-rdb-concessional-nfl-current-us/afghanistan/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-rdb-concessional-nfl-current-us/afghanistan/ecuador/">Afghanistan vs Ecuador: Net financial flows, RDB concessional</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, RDB concessional (NFL, current US$)
Unit
NFL, current US$
Source
International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB), note: https://www.worldbank.org/en/programs/debt-statistics
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
106 places, 4,574 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Net financial flows received by the borrower during the year are disbursements of loans and credits less repayments of principal. Concessional financial flows cover disbursements made through concessional lending facilities. Regional development banks are the African Development Bank, in Tunis, Tunisia, which serves all of Africa, including North Africa; the Asian Development Bank, in Manila, Philippines, which serves South and Central Asia and East Asia and Pacific; the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, in London, United Kingdom, which serves Europe and Central Asia; and the Inter-American Development Bank, in Washington, D.C., which serves the Americas. Aggregates include amounts for economies not specified elsewhere. Data are in current U.S. dollars.