East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Tanzania: Net financial flows, RDB concessional (NFL, current US$)
Net financial flows, RDB concessional (NFL, current US$) over time
- East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
- Tanzania
How they compare
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) currently reports 73.52 million NFL, current US$ against 65.58 million NFL, current US$ in Tanzania, a difference of 7.95 million NFL, current US$.
That makes East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s figure about 1.1 times Tanzania's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1978 it was East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ahead.
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 9th and Tanzania ranks 9th of 12 groups.
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 75.42 million NFL, current US$ | 5.66 million NFL, current US$ | 69.77 million NFL, current US$ | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) |
| 1980s | 86.76 million NFL, current US$ | 26.04 million NFL, current US$ | 60.73 million NFL, current US$ | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) |
| 1990s | 254.26 million NFL, current US$ | 24.55 million NFL, current US$ | 229.71 million NFL, current US$ | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) |
| 2000s | 355.05 million NFL, current US$ | 75.93 million NFL, current US$ | 279.12 million NFL, current US$ | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) |
| 2010s | 164.58 million NFL, current US$ | 162.28 million NFL, current US$ | 2.30 million NFL, current US$ | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) |
| 2020s | 153.17 million NFL, current US$ | 87.73 million NFL, current US$ | 65.44 million NFL, current US$ | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net financial flows, rdb concessional, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Tanzania?
- East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), at 73.52 million NFL, current US$ against 65.58 million NFL, current US$ in Tanzania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in net financial flows, rdb concessional between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Tanzania?
- 7.95 million NFL, current US$, with East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Tanzania?
- 45 years are reported by both, from 1978 to 2024.
- How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Tanzania rank globally for net financial flows, rdb concessional?
- East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 9th and Tanzania ranks 9th of 12 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB), note: https://www.worldbank.org/en/programs/debt-statistics, published as Net financial flows, RDB concessional (NFL, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net financial flows received by the borrower during the year are disbursements of loans and credits less repayments of principal. Concessional financial flows cover disbursements made through concessional lending facilities. Regional development banks are the African Development Bank, in Tunis, Tunisia, which serves all of Africa, including North Africa; the Asian Development Bank, in Manila, Philippines, which serves South and Central Asia and East Asia and Pacific; the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, in London, United Kingdom, which serves Europe and Central Asia; and the Inter-American Development Bank, in Washington, D.C., which serves the Americas. Aggregates include amounts for economies not specified elsewhere. Data are in current U.S. dollars.