Mauritius vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net financial flows, RDB concessional

Mauritius
-147,360 NFL, current US$
in 2024
Sao Tome and Principe
-614,664 NFL, current US$
in 2024
Mauritius rank
44th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
46th

Net financial flows, RDB concessional over time

  • Mauritius
  • Sao Tome and Principe
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M198120022024

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports -147,360 NFL, current US$ against -614,664 NFL, current US$ in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 467,304 NFL, current US$.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Mauritius ranks 44th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 46th of 94 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1980s 570,223 NFL, current US$ 2.65 million NFL, current US$ 2.08 million NFL, current US$ Sao Tome and Principe
1990s -15,336 NFL, current US$ 7.13 million NFL, current US$ 7.15 million NFL, current US$ Sao Tome and Principe
2000s -181,361 NFL, current US$ 1.05 million NFL, current US$ 1.23 million NFL, current US$ Sao Tome and Principe
2010s -149,849 NFL, current US$ 1.56 million NFL, current US$ 1.71 million NFL, current US$ Sao Tome and Principe
2020s -146,884 NFL, current US$ 673,078 NFL, current US$ 819,962 NFL, current US$ Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, rdb concessional, Mauritius or Sao Tome and Principe?
Mauritius, at -147,360 NFL, current US$ against -614,664 NFL, current US$ in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2024.
What is the difference in net financial flows, rdb concessional between Mauritius and Sao Tome and Principe?
467,304 NFL, current US$, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Sao Tome and Principe?
44 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2024.
How do Mauritius and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for net financial flows, rdb concessional?
Mauritius ranks 44th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 46th of 94 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB), note: https://www.worldbank.org/en/programs/debt-statistics, published as Net financial flows, RDB concessional (NFL, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net financial flows, RDB concessional. Statizoid, drawing on International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB), note: https://www.worldbank.org/en/programs/debt-statistics. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-rdb-concessional-nfl-current-us/mauritius/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-rdb-concessional-nfl-current-us/mauritius/sao-tome-and-principe/">Mauritius vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net financial flows, RDB concessional</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, RDB concessional (NFL, current US$)
Unit
NFL, current US$
Source
International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB), note: https://www.worldbank.org/en/programs/debt-statistics
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
106 places, 4,574 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Net financial flows received by the borrower during the year are disbursements of loans and credits less repayments of principal. Concessional financial flows cover disbursements made through concessional lending facilities. Regional development banks are the African Development Bank, in Tunis, Tunisia, which serves all of Africa, including North Africa; the Asian Development Bank, in Manila, Philippines, which serves South and Central Asia and East Asia and Pacific; the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, in London, United Kingdom, which serves Europe and Central Asia; and the Inter-American Development Bank, in Washington, D.C., which serves the Americas. Aggregates include amounts for economies not specified elsewhere. Data are in current U.S. dollars.