Nepal vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Net financial flows, RDB concessional
Net financial flows, RDB concessional over time
- Nepal
- Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
How they compare
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) currently reports 432.90 million NFL, current US$ against 187.76 million NFL, current US$ in Nepal, a difference of 245.13 million NFL, current US$.
That makes Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s figure about 2.3 times Nepal's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 50 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Nepal ahead.
Nepal ranks 5th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 6th of 94 countries.
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 5.56 million NFL, current US$ | 27.27 million NFL, current US$ | 21.71 million NFL, current US$ | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) |
| 1980s | 31.59 million NFL, current US$ | 233.21 million NFL, current US$ | 201.62 million NFL, current US$ | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) |
| 1990s | 61.03 million NFL, current US$ | 514.73 million NFL, current US$ | 453.70 million NFL, current US$ | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) |
| 2000s | 28.92 million NFL, current US$ | 655.31 million NFL, current US$ | 626.38 million NFL, current US$ | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) |
| 2010s | 59.23 million NFL, current US$ | 1.25 billion NFL, current US$ | 1.19 billion NFL, current US$ | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) |
| 2020s | 248.99 million NFL, current US$ | 523.53 million NFL, current US$ | 274.55 million NFL, current US$ | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net financial flows, rdb concessional, Nepal or Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), at 432.90 million NFL, current US$ against 187.76 million NFL, current US$ in Nepal as of 2024.
- What is the difference in net financial flows, rdb concessional between Nepal and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- 245.13 million NFL, current US$, with Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- 50 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2024.
- How do Nepal and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank globally for net financial flows, rdb concessional?
- Nepal ranks 5th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 6th of 94 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB), note: https://www.worldbank.org/en/programs/debt-statistics, published as Net financial flows, RDB concessional (NFL, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net financial flows received by the borrower during the year are disbursements of loans and credits less repayments of principal. Concessional financial flows cover disbursements made through concessional lending facilities. Regional development banks are the African Development Bank, in Tunis, Tunisia, which serves all of Africa, including North Africa; the Asian Development Bank, in Manila, Philippines, which serves South and Central Asia and East Asia and Pacific; the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, in London, United Kingdom, which serves Europe and Central Asia; and the Inter-American Development Bank, in Washington, D.C., which serves the Americas. Aggregates include amounts for economies not specified elsewhere. Data are in current U.S. dollars.