Ecuador vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Net financial flows, RDB nonconcessional
Net financial flows, RDB nonconcessional over time
- Ecuador
- Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
How they compare
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) currently reports 2.48 billion NFL, current US$ against 964.20 million NFL, current US$ in Ecuador, a difference of 1.51 billion NFL, current US$.
That makes Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s figure about 2.6 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ahead.
Ecuador ranks 3rd and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 4th of 102 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 4.41 million NFL, current US$ | 28.66 million NFL, current US$ | 24.25 million NFL, current US$ | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) |
| 1980s | 53.25 million NFL, current US$ | 182.46 million NFL, current US$ | 129.21 million NFL, current US$ | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) |
| 1990s | 56.75 million NFL, current US$ | 228.06 million NFL, current US$ | 171.32 million NFL, current US$ | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) |
| 2000s | 32.20 million NFL, current US$ | -164.50 million NFL, current US$ | 196.70 million NFL, current US$ | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 379.23 million NFL, current US$ | 726.02 million NFL, current US$ | 346.78 million NFL, current US$ | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) |
| 2020s | 713.63 million NFL, current US$ | 1.41 billion NFL, current US$ | 699.26 million NFL, current US$ | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net financial flows, rdb nonconcessional, Ecuador or Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), at 2.48 billion NFL, current US$ against 964.20 million NFL, current US$ in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in net financial flows, rdb nonconcessional between Ecuador and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- 1.51 billion NFL, current US$, with Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank globally for net financial flows, rdb nonconcessional?
- Ecuador ranks 3rd and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 4th of 102 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB), published as Net financial flows, RDB nonconcessional (NFL, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net financial flows received by the borrower during the year are disbursements of loans and credits less repayments of principal. Nonconcessional financial flows cover all disbursements except those made through concessional lending facilities. Regional development banks are the African Development Bank, in Tunis, Tunisia, which serves all of Africa, including North Africa; the Asian Development Bank, in Manila, Philippines, which serves South and Central Asia and East Asia and Pacific; the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, in London, United Kingdom, which serves Europe and Central Asia; and the Inter-American Development Bank, in Washington, D.C., which serves the Americas. Aggregates include amounts for economies not specified elsewhere. Data are in current U.S. dollars.