Eswatini vs Papua New Guinea: Net financial flows, RDB nonconcessional (NFL, current US$)

Eswatini
75.76 million NFL, current US$
in 2025
Papua New Guinea
99.64 million NFL, current US$
in 2025
Eswatini rank
24th
Papua New Guinea rank
21st

Net financial flows, RDB nonconcessional (NFL, current US$) over time

  • Eswatini
  • Papua New Guinea
0200.0M400.0M600.0M197520002025

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 99.64 million NFL, current US$ against 75.76 million NFL, current US$ in Eswatini, a difference of 23.87 million NFL, current US$.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.3 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1978 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Eswatini ranks 24th and Papua New Guinea ranks 21st of 102 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Papua New Guinea in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1970s 2.76 million NFL, current US$ 2.79 million NFL, current US$ 34,546 NFL, current US$ Papua New Guinea
1980s 1.31 million NFL, current US$ 6.47 million NFL, current US$ 5.16 million NFL, current US$ Papua New Guinea
1990s 3.60 million NFL, current US$ 5.42 million NFL, current US$ 1.82 million NFL, current US$ Papua New Guinea
2000s 3.66 million NFL, current US$ -1.26 million NFL, current US$ 4.92 million NFL, current US$ Eswatini
2010s 1.96 million NFL, current US$ 73.46 million NFL, current US$ 71.50 million NFL, current US$ Papua New Guinea
2020s 36.51 million NFL, current US$ 224.20 million NFL, current US$ 187.68 million NFL, current US$ Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, rdb nonconcessional, Eswatini or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 99.64 million NFL, current US$ against 75.76 million NFL, current US$ in Eswatini as of 2025.
What is the difference in net financial flows, rdb nonconcessional between Eswatini and Papua New Guinea?
23.87 million NFL, current US$, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Papua New Guinea?
48 years are reported by both, from 1978 to 2025.
How do Eswatini and Papua New Guinea rank globally for net financial flows, rdb nonconcessional?
Eswatini ranks 24th and Papua New Guinea ranks 21st of 102 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB), published as Net financial flows, RDB nonconcessional (NFL, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Papua New Guinea: Net financial flows, RDB nonconcessional. Statizoid, drawing on International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-rdb-nonconcessional-nfl-current-us/eswatini/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-rdb-nonconcessional-nfl-current-us/eswatini/papua-new-guinea/">Eswatini vs Papua New Guinea: Net financial flows, RDB nonconcessional</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, RDB nonconcessional (NFL, current US$)
Unit
NFL, current US$
Source
International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
115 places, 4,569 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

Net financial flows received by the borrower during the year are disbursements of loans and credits less repayments of principal. Nonconcessional financial flows cover all disbursements except those made through concessional lending facilities. Regional development banks are the African Development Bank, in Tunis, Tunisia, which serves all of Africa, including North Africa; the Asian Development Bank, in Manila, Philippines, which serves South and Central Asia and East Asia and Pacific; the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, in London, United Kingdom, which serves Europe and Central Asia; and the Inter-American Development Bank, in Washington, D.C., which serves the Americas. Aggregates include amounts for economies not specified elsewhere. Data are in current U.S. dollars.