Gambia vs Zimbabwe: Net financial flows, RDB nonconcessional (NFL, current US$)

Gambia
300,000 NFL, current US$
in 2017
Zimbabwe
0 NFL, current US$
in 2025
Gambia rank
45th
Zimbabwe rank
46th

Net financial flows, RDB nonconcessional (NFL, current US$) over time

  • Gambia
  • Zimbabwe
-50.0M050.0M100.0M197720012025

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 300,000 NFL, current US$ against 0 NFL, current US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 300,000 NFL, current US$.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 24 shared years of data; in 1984 it was Gambia ahead.

Gambia ranks 45th and Zimbabwe ranks 46th of 102 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gambia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1980s 123,079 NFL, current US$ 9.16 million NFL, current US$ 9.04 million NFL, current US$ Zimbabwe
1990s -1.33 million NFL, current US$ 23.99 million NFL, current US$ 25.32 million NFL, current US$ Zimbabwe
2000s -107,181 NFL, current US$ -1.01 million NFL, current US$ 898,658 NFL, current US$ Gambia
2010s 300,000 NFL, current US$ 0 NFL, current US$ 300,000 NFL, current US$ Gambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, rdb nonconcessional, Gambia or Zimbabwe?
Gambia, at 300,000 NFL, current US$ against 0 NFL, current US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2017.
What is the difference in net financial flows, rdb nonconcessional between Gambia and Zimbabwe?
300,000 NFL, current US$, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Zimbabwe?
24 years are reported by both, from 1984 to 2017.
How do Gambia and Zimbabwe rank globally for net financial flows, rdb nonconcessional?
Gambia ranks 45th and Zimbabwe ranks 46th of 102 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB), published as Net financial flows, RDB nonconcessional (NFL, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gambia vs Zimbabwe: Net financial flows, RDB nonconcessional. Statizoid, drawing on International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-rdb-nonconcessional-nfl-current-us/gambia-the/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-rdb-nonconcessional-nfl-current-us/gambia-the/zimbabwe/">Gambia vs Zimbabwe: Net financial flows, RDB nonconcessional</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, RDB nonconcessional (NFL, current US$)
Unit
NFL, current US$
Source
International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
115 places, 4,569 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

Net financial flows received by the borrower during the year are disbursements of loans and credits less repayments of principal. Nonconcessional financial flows cover all disbursements except those made through concessional lending facilities. Regional development banks are the African Development Bank, in Tunis, Tunisia, which serves all of Africa, including North Africa; the Asian Development Bank, in Manila, Philippines, which serves South and Central Asia and East Asia and Pacific; the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, in London, United Kingdom, which serves Europe and Central Asia; and the Inter-American Development Bank, in Washington, D.C., which serves the Americas. Aggregates include amounts for economies not specified elsewhere. Data are in current U.S. dollars.