IDA only vs Uzbekistan: Net financial flows, RDB nonconcessional

IDA only
2.32 billion NFL, current US$
in 2023
Uzbekistan
736.24 million NFL, current US$
in 2024
IDA only rank
5th
Uzbekistan rank
7th

Net financial flows, RDB nonconcessional over time

  • IDA only
  • Uzbekistan
01.0B2.0B3.0B197019972024

How they compare

IDA only currently reports 2.32 billion NFL, current US$ against 736.24 million NFL, current US$ in Uzbekistan, a difference of 1.58 billion NFL, current US$.

That makes IDA only's figure about 3.2 times Uzbekistan's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1994 it was IDA only ahead.

IDA only ranks 5th and Uzbekistan ranks 7th of 12 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, IDA only averaged higher in 2 and Uzbekistan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade IDA only Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1990s -50.73 million NFL, current US$ 28.31 million NFL, current US$ 79.04 million NFL, current US$ Uzbekistan
2000s -8.89 million NFL, current US$ 39.72 million NFL, current US$ 48.61 million NFL, current US$ Uzbekistan
2010s 774.21 million NFL, current US$ 243.85 million NFL, current US$ 530.36 million NFL, current US$ IDA only
2020s 2.56 billion NFL, current US$ 585.41 million NFL, current US$ 1.98 billion NFL, current US$ IDA only

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, rdb nonconcessional, IDA only or Uzbekistan?
IDA only, at 2.32 billion NFL, current US$ against 736.24 million NFL, current US$ in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in net financial flows, rdb nonconcessional between IDA only and Uzbekistan?
1.58 billion NFL, current US$, with IDA only ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IDA only and Uzbekistan?
30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do IDA only and Uzbekistan rank globally for net financial flows, rdb nonconcessional?
IDA only ranks 5th and Uzbekistan ranks 7th of 12 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB), published as Net financial flows, RDB nonconcessional (NFL, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IDA only vs Uzbekistan: Net financial flows, RDB nonconcessional. Statizoid, drawing on International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-rdb-nonconcessional-nfl-current-us/ida-only/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-rdb-nonconcessional-nfl-current-us/ida-only/uzbekistan/">IDA only vs Uzbekistan: Net financial flows, RDB nonconcessional</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, RDB nonconcessional (NFL, current US$)
Unit
NFL, current US$
Source
International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
113 places, 4,413 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Net financial flows received by the borrower during the year are disbursements of loans and credits less repayments of principal. Nonconcessional financial flows cover all disbursements except those made through concessional lending facilities. Regional development banks are the African Development Bank, in Tunis, Tunisia, which serves all of Africa, including North Africa; the Asian Development Bank, in Manila, Philippines, which serves South and Central Asia and East Asia and Pacific; the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, in London, United Kingdom, which serves Europe and Central Asia; and the Inter-American Development Bank, in Washington, D.C., which serves the Americas. Aggregates include amounts for economies not specified elsewhere. Data are in current U.S. dollars.