Mauritius vs Peru: Net financial flows, RDB nonconcessional (NFL, current US$)

Mauritius
-34.70 million NFL, current US$
in 2025
Peru
-27.09 million NFL, current US$
in 2025
Mauritius rank
79th
Peru rank
76th

Net financial flows, RDB nonconcessional (NFL, current US$) over time

  • Mauritius
  • Peru
-1.0B-500.0M0500.0M1.0B197019972025

How they compare

Peru currently reports -27.09 million NFL, current US$ against -34.70 million NFL, current US$ in Mauritius, a difference of 7.61 million NFL, current US$.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Peru ahead.

Mauritius ranks 79th and Peru ranks 76th of 102 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Peru Difference Ahead
1970s 1.23 million NFL, current US$ 6.74 million NFL, current US$ 5.52 million NFL, current US$ Peru
1980s 2.92 million NFL, current US$ 57.22 million NFL, current US$ 54.29 million NFL, current US$ Peru
1990s -1.80 million NFL, current US$ 176.91 million NFL, current US$ 178.71 million NFL, current US$ Peru
2000s 2.40 million NFL, current US$ 157.81 million NFL, current US$ 155.41 million NFL, current US$ Peru
2010s 53.40 million NFL, current US$ -289.49 million NFL, current US$ 342.89 million NFL, current US$ Mauritius
2020s 62.02 million NFL, current US$ 417.76 million NFL, current US$ 355.74 million NFL, current US$ Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, rdb nonconcessional, Mauritius or Peru?
Peru, at -27.09 million NFL, current US$ against -34.70 million NFL, current US$ in Mauritius as of 2025.
What is the difference in net financial flows, rdb nonconcessional between Mauritius and Peru?
7.61 million NFL, current US$, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Peru?
50 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2025.
How do Mauritius and Peru rank globally for net financial flows, rdb nonconcessional?
Mauritius ranks 79th and Peru ranks 76th of 102 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB), published as Net financial flows, RDB nonconcessional (NFL, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Peru: Net financial flows, RDB nonconcessional. Statizoid, drawing on International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-rdb-nonconcessional-nfl-current-us/mauritius/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-rdb-nonconcessional-nfl-current-us/mauritius/peru/">Mauritius vs Peru: Net financial flows, RDB nonconcessional</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, RDB nonconcessional (NFL, current US$)
Unit
NFL, current US$
Source
International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
115 places, 4,569 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

Net financial flows received by the borrower during the year are disbursements of loans and credits less repayments of principal. Nonconcessional financial flows cover all disbursements except those made through concessional lending facilities. Regional development banks are the African Development Bank, in Tunis, Tunisia, which serves all of Africa, including North Africa; the Asian Development Bank, in Manila, Philippines, which serves South and Central Asia and East Asia and Pacific; the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, in London, United Kingdom, which serves Europe and Central Asia; and the Inter-American Development Bank, in Washington, D.C., which serves the Americas. Aggregates include amounts for economies not specified elsewhere. Data are in current U.S. dollars.