Zambia vs Zimbabwe: Net financial flows, RDB nonconcessional (NFL, current US$)

Zambia
1.18 million NFL, current US$
in 2025
Zimbabwe
0 NFL, current US$
in 2025
Zambia rank
44th
Zimbabwe rank
46th

Net financial flows, RDB nonconcessional (NFL, current US$) over time

  • Zambia
  • Zimbabwe
-50.0M050.0M100.0M197419992025

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 1.18 million NFL, current US$ against 0 NFL, current US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1.18 million NFL, current US$.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 38 shared years of data; in 1984 it was Zambia ahead.

Zambia ranks 44th and Zimbabwe ranks 46th of 102 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Zambia averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Zambia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1980s 14.36 million NFL, current US$ 9.16 million NFL, current US$ 5.20 million NFL, current US$ Zambia
1990s -2.67 million NFL, current US$ 23.99 million NFL, current US$ 26.66 million NFL, current US$ Zimbabwe
2000s -7.99 million NFL, current US$ -711,506 NFL, current US$ 7.28 million NFL, current US$ Zimbabwe
2010s 21.59 million NFL, current US$ -1.75 million NFL, current US$ 23.34 million NFL, current US$ Zambia
2020s 52.94 million NFL, current US$ 0 NFL, current US$ 52.94 million NFL, current US$ Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net financial flows, rdb nonconcessional, Zambia or Zimbabwe?
Zambia, at 1.18 million NFL, current US$ against 0 NFL, current US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
What is the difference in net financial flows, rdb nonconcessional between Zambia and Zimbabwe?
1.18 million NFL, current US$, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Zambia and Zimbabwe?
38 years are reported by both, from 1984 to 2025.
How do Zambia and Zimbabwe rank globally for net financial flows, rdb nonconcessional?
Zambia ranks 44th and Zimbabwe ranks 46th of 102 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB), published as Net financial flows, RDB nonconcessional (NFL, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Zambia vs Zimbabwe: Net financial flows, RDB nonconcessional. Statizoid, drawing on International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-rdb-nonconcessional-nfl-current-us/zambia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-financial-flows-rdb-nonconcessional-nfl-current-us/zambia/zimbabwe/">Zambia vs Zimbabwe: Net financial flows, RDB nonconcessional</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net financial flows, RDB nonconcessional (NFL, current US$)
Unit
NFL, current US$
Source
International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
115 places, 4,569 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

Net financial flows received by the borrower during the year are disbursements of loans and credits less repayments of principal. Nonconcessional financial flows cover all disbursements except those made through concessional lending facilities. Regional development banks are the African Development Bank, in Tunis, Tunisia, which serves all of Africa, including North Africa; the Asian Development Bank, in Manila, Philippines, which serves South and Central Asia and East Asia and Pacific; the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, in London, United Kingdom, which serves Europe and Central Asia; and the Inter-American Development Bank, in Washington, D.C., which serves the Americas. Aggregates include amounts for economies not specified elsewhere. Data are in current U.S. dollars.